Pointless activities of indian women organisation - Instablogs
Pointless activities of indian women organisation
Rudra Bhaumik , kolkata: Mar 5 2009
Made Popular Mar 5 2009
India :

Pointless activities of indian women organisation

Unnecessary agitation is going to be created on 8th march on eve of women’s day by some women organization in India. The radical feminists planned to block the roads and give some serious exercise of loudspeakers around India. We are already get so much irritation from rallies and ‘lectures’ of our politicians…now women organization are ready to flex their muscles. They will present some information based on their assumption and try to fool women.

Funded profusely by government and other cunning organizations, they are going to waste all the money preparing needless leaflets, hoardings, placards etc. They don’t probe into the remote rural area where the women need some extra facility; never try to teach them how to prepare before giving birth of child.

Women activities give only excuse or just suppress that... because they want publicity only so they join their hands with media and work on some discrete isolate area. If they work from bottom from the heart rural women would not be suffered so silently.

Who will focus the pain of old farmer those who burnt their body to cultivate? Who will come forward for the labour suffering from TB but still pulling heavy loads to just feed the family? Who will guide the poor mother to take the best way for nourishing her baby? There are major issues than why some girls were be slapped at pub or why still young women can’t do her catwalk at midnight in highway.

Another thing their main issue for the year is ‘violence against women’. I want to say is the number of men who suffered from violence is negligible comparing with women. Can they give me clear statistics how many women and men died in violence past year?

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
2 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
So true. I would like to answer your last sentence. Violence against men is NOT taken into cognisance by law. Infact, it is ridiculed and laughed at while violence against women is taken very seriously and it is cognisable, non-bailable and non-compoundable. A woman has the right to hit a man in India. Very soon, with the growing power of women’s groups, women would have the right to rape small boys and men and the right to murder them - thanks to women’s empowerment.
2 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
We need to coin ways and means to sabotage female terrorism! Their propaganda needs to be counteracted in a planned and co-ordianated manner.And I happy that likes of Rohan and Rudra are doing a good job.Keep it up.

Have a look at my recent article :

http://indowaves.instablogs.com/entry/media-is-haunted-by-urban-women/
1 Stars
Me Enki
New York City, United States
According to a recent post on instablogs 100,000 women are burned every year in India. That’s over 500 times the number of people killed by Muslim Terrorists last year. It sounds like violence against women is a major issue. Much bigger than the media created ”War on Terror”. Your insensitivity to this issue is depressing.

But what is even more depressing is that most women don’t care either.
1 Stars
Before blindly believing such misleading articles by vested media interests, it would be helpful for yourself to do some ground reality check on such stories to avoid getting flak when you support such bullshit stories.
Reality is that the story has overblown the data out of proportions by magnitude to realize political vendetta. Indian women are the safest of all women elsewhere but that is never projected as that will stop all funds of women pamperment.
1 Stars
Yes it would apply to you first. And the so called complaints of attack on women are all rubbish stories made to fill up newspaper columns.

Women have made it a fashion to cry hoarse and victimize men.
1 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
@Mita,

Have you done any survey about safety of men in Delhi? Why talk about safety of women alone?

Moreover, statistics are inflated to get more funds. When a woman files a case against a man, there are several laws to deal with them and all are cognisable, non-bailable and non-compoundable. The term ”Cognisable” means, taking cognisance of. It implies that the cases are recorded and they get reflected at the National Crime Records Bureau even if they are false. On the other hand, if a man files a case, the police can at best record a non-cognisable case which means ”No cognisance”. It does not get recorded at the NCRB level even if the case is true. Moreover, men don’t report about harassment of wives as it is an insult to their masulinity. People would laugh at men when they report harassment by women.
2 Stars
Mita
New Delhi, India
Why do you believe that what you say is the ’reality’. I suggest you come to Delhi and do some groundwork reality check. Bangalore too has become very unsafe for women.
1 Stars
Me Enki
New York City, United States
There is really no way to convince these guys. The only way to actually change the situation is a clean sweep of misogynists.
1 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
@Enki,

Fighting for men’s rights does not constitute hatred of women. Fighting against feminism also does not constitute hatred of women. Feminism is an anti-male, anti-family, anti-marriage, pro-abortion revolution. In many ways and in the long run, feminism is an anti-women revolution as women will ultimately pay the price of the misdeeds of feminists.

I thought you were debating about crimes on women and men with an open mind. I didn’t know that you were a radical feminist and man-hater who wants all men to be sent to the gallows!
1 Stars
Me Enki
New York City, United States
I don’t hate men but I do hate jerks. The problem with the world today is that it is overrun with jerks.

As far as your views of feminism you sound like an Islamic fundamentalist (actually, religious fundamentalists of all stripes agree, they reveal their stupidity and ultimate doom by trying to kill each other).

It’s clear you don’t know how to get women to love you. A man without a woman’s love becomes, admittedly, an angry bull. In case you didn’t know, a man in love or a woman in love will do anything for their partner. Your problem is you don’t have real love with any woman and you’ve been trained by the media and rape music that the way to seduce a woman is to crush her psychologically, spiritually and physically, in other words, to reduce her to a slave. No matter what you have been trained, slaves don’t love their masters and never will.

Krishna was loved by scores of women. It wasn’t because he oppressed them. It’s easy to be loved by women. Instead of thinking and talking like a stereotypical jerk; think, act and behave like a noble knight in shining armor and women will love you. Become a champion of the weak, a protector of women and generous with your sentiments.

Men are getting assaulted? Yes, quite true too. Wouldn’t a world ruled by women be a more peaceful world? A world without being assaulted with kung fu fighting Bollywood movies? If you don’t want men to live in a violent world the best way to achieve it is to support women.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
@Enki,

And you thought I will swallow your bullshit! Eh???

Getting personal with me? I can do that too with you.

Mind your language and words! Calling me Islamic fundamentalist and a jerk? What are you then? An Osama Bin Laden who supports feminazism - the ultimate in feminazis!

Yes, you are the neo-Talibans who want to enslave the men by having the men as ”Noble knight in shining armour” and yet ask for equality and then have the women rule over them. This is called equality. Anybody who opposes you is a jerk and a fundamentalist.

Hell! You say women are weak. Then where is the equality? If A=B, then everything that is A = B. No exceptions! Now look at this trick. You want men to be like peons in shining armour to protect women while the women rule and make rules for men to follow, eh!

Men are getting assaulted by women and male supporters of feminazis. Who is going to protect them? And who told you that women make good rulers? Most women rulers in all parts of India have been no better or worse than men.
1 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY BY FEMINISTS

“Destroy the family,” as Lenin said, “and you destroy society.” Thereby he merely repeated what Socrates had said before and what Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx put into words. Lenin set out to do just that, hoping that a new society — with the State as the ultimate father — could be constructed.

“How will the family unit be destroyed? ... the demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare.”
— Female Liberation, by Roxanne Dunbar.

“The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. ... “Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests. ...
— Functions of the Family,
Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969.

“Feminists have long criticized marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for women.”— Is Marriage the Answer?
by Barbara Findlen, Ms magazine, May-June, 1995

“[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.”— Alison Jagger, Feminist Politics and Human Nature

“The first class opposition that appears in history coincides with the development of the antagonism between man and woman in monogamous marriage, and the first class oppression coincides with that of the female sex by the male.”
— Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State
(New York, International Publishers,1942) p.58]

Read these anti-male statements by notorious feminists:

Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman. - Andrea Dworkin

Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the experience.
- Catherine Comins, Vassar College

To be male is to be a kind of idiot savant
- Germaine Greer

All men are rapists and that’s all they are
- Marilyn French

still,feminists say that they are not doing anything harmful.
it’s time to not to believe in feminism anymore.

“I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which a man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.” – Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan

“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” – Marilyn French, Author, “The Women’s Room”

“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, MS. Magazine Editor

“I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.” – Robin Morgan

“And let’s put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism–the lie that there can be such a thing as ‘men’s liberation groups.’ Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group, specifically because of a ‘threatening’ characteristic shared by the latter group–skin color, sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed FUCKED UP by being masters, but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism–the oppressed have no alternative–for they have no power–but to fight. In the long run, Women’s Liberation will of course free men–but in the short run it’s going to cost men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women–kill your fathers, not your mothers.” – Robin Morgan

“My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don’t even need to shrug. I simply don’t care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don’t matter.” – Marilyn French, in “The Women’s Room”

*MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants... the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.’ *MAN: ... an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched ... a contradictory baby-man ... *TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... ‘Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from “testosterone poisoning.”

“Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is, if you don’t like it, bad luck — and if you get in my way I’ll run you down.” Signed: Liberated Woman, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia - 9 February 1996

“No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” Simone de Beauvoir, author of _The Second Sex_, the book that is credited with launching the mainstream of the modern feminist movement —
Our demand is not for equality. Who wants to be like men! We are trying as women to define ourselves. We not only reject the definitions that men have given us, but reject becoming like men. –From WOMEN OF THE WORLD UNITE — WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT OUR MEN! [In] Notes from the First Year. New York: The New York Radical Women, 1968.

Renuka Chowdhary - a radical Indian feminist
“It is men’s turn to suffer” - Renuka Chowdhary on National television speaking about the Domestic Violence Act.
“It is not such a bad idea, except that I have such pity for men.” - Renuka Chowdhary when Karan Thapar (on a CNN-IBN interview) asked her if she thought that men should first suffer before she considers amendments to check misuse of the law.
http://www.ibnlive.com/news/act-wont-hit-good-hubbies-renuka/26051-3-6.html
“The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things.” – Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)
“To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” – Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto

Boys are immature, guys are jerks, men are rare.”
“No woman ever falls in love with a man unless she has a better opinion of him than he deserves.”
“A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle.” -Gloria Steinem

“The perfect man is like the Lochness Monster... they say he exists but no one’s ever seen him!”
“I think, therefore I am single.”
“Mr. Right’s coming.. but he’s in Africa and he’s walking!” -Oprah
1 Stars
ROHAN D 498a.org
Bangalore, India
@Enki,

Who is the jerk and fundamentalist? Is it me who wants to preserve the family or is it the feminists who want to destroy the family and enslave men?
1 Stars
How about women learning to respect men and take some responsibility?
Add your Comment